Where does a high-view of marriage lead you
theologically and practically?
Marriage, after all, was created by God as a
reflection of Himself and the Church. So what does your view of marriage say
about God? And what does it say about the Church? If marriage is to be so
esteemed, is divorce ever an option? These are some of the key questions
that the author of Fractured Covenants deals with. More specifically, is
marriage as God intended still a binding covenant even in cases of abuse?
After all, “there is an enormous difference between a disappointing marriage,
and a destructive one”. (All quotes in this post from Fractured Covenants
unless otherwise indicated.) Scripture also has a lot to say on the value
and protection of women. “Mosaic divorce allowance was given by God for
humanitarian means – to protect women from cruelty.” It was permitted because
of sin. God himself “divorced” his bride (Israel) for their adultery. In fact,
does the Bible actually say, “God hates divorce”? I have heard this
quoted many times in my life, and I was shocked to realize that that is NOT
what the verse says! The author shows how the NIV here has an accurate
translation of the Hebrew:
“The man who hates and
divorces his wife,” says the Lord, the God of Israel,
“does violence to the one he should protect,” says the Lord Almighty. - Mal 2:13
“does violence to the one he should protect,” says the Lord Almighty. - Mal 2:13
See here for explanation of the Hebrew.
God himself calls for husbands to love their
wives “as their own body” and judges those who oppress and abuse others (see Isa.
10:1–4; 30:12–14; Jer. 6:6-8; 9:6–11). If marriage is a reflection of God, then
both parties should mirror his love and grace (although imperfectly). But what
happens when one party continually and unrepentantly does the exact opposite? What
should the church’s response be to a woman (or man) abused by their spouse?
The author of Fractured Covenants does a
fantastic job of exegeting scripture and showing us what God’s design for
husbands and wives in marriage is. Furthermore, as a trained Biblical counselor
and an abuse survivor herself she also writes about how we should respond when
there is emotional or verbal abuse in a marriage.
There are Christian circles (many of them
Reformed or solid theologically) that sadly ignore or downplay emotional (or otherwise
non-physical) abuse in marriage. But this is not right. “Averting our eyes
when one of our sisters is being abused, in any form, is not Christ-like.”
Indeed not! But what exactly is emotional abuse? Examples include “verbal
attacks, silent treatment, destructive criticism, manipulation, lying, threats,
and withholding affection. These toxic relationships affect the victim’s
ability to trust others and enjoy healthy relationships in the future.”
This book also uncovers the reasons many
churches and pastors do not take abuse seriously and push for victims to return
to their abusers. The issue of abuse is not one you can truly understand
without either experiencing it yourself, walking alongside someone who has
experienced it, or had very specific training about it. Too many churches
and pastors are ignorant (or in plain denial) of the dark hidden aspects of
abuse, and also unaware that abusers are very good at hiding their sin and
appearing very godly. They are ignorant of the fact that an abuser cannot
simply “repent” and suddenly be a great husband. Thinking someone can go from
being abusive to a true godly person is incredibly naïve. Any professional
counselor will tell you that men like this need intensive and long-term
counseling to overcome their abusive tendencies. He is a liar and a slanderer
and cannot be trusted until there is real remorse, repentance and true
change of character. To pressure a woman to return to her abusive husband
when they have not taken his sin seriously is wrong and damaging, not only to
the woman herself, but also to the church at large.
In Ephesians 5:21, immediately prior to the
verse where it says, “wives submit to your husbands,” commands, “submit to one
another out of reverence for Christ”. This is speaking to both husband and
wife. Submission is not just for wives, both husbands and wives are to
submit to one another. Certainly, for the wife this is more specifically commanded, but it should not be taken in isolation. In the book, the author describes what this means
beautifully: “Biblical submission is an aspect of Christian liberty wherein we
prefer others to ourselves. It’s an expression of Christian love, intended to
glorify God in all that it chooses to do. It kindly and generously serves
others, to provide for their comfort. It defers to others, it edifies them, and
it blesses them according to their needs. It’s genuinely benevolent and seeks
the welfare and best interests of others. It diligently pursues life, health,
and dignity for others as well as oneself. Biblical submission, far from being
a sanctified form of dictatorship, honors God as supreme and honors others as
his creatures made in his image.” The author does a good job at showing how scripture
makes it pretty clear that, “Men’s and women’s rights within the family are the same
size – with each having equal rights to having their opinions and desires
respected, as well as input into decision making and the right to live free
from physical and verbal abuse.” Yes, wives are called to submit, but this doesn't mean she does not have a voice or can be ignored or abused.
Yet, sadly, as the author shows, there are
churches, organizations and Christians that emphasize the command of wives submission over the command on
husbands to love their wives as Christ and their own body. This is wrong,
dangerous, and a misuse of Scripture. For that is NOT how God intended marriage
to be. Indeed, “when a command for submission is wielded like a weapon, it is a
sure sign that the follow-up verses on ‘loving [your] wife as Christ loved the
Church’ are not being obeyed.” If a husband is choosing not to love his wife
as God calls him to (verses 25-30), submitting to her out of love (verse 21)
and honoring her as the weaker vessel (1 Peter 3:7), he is willfully
breaking, and not honoring the marriage covenant. Furthermore, “Men who
verbally abuse their wives are what the Bible calls ‘revilers’…. You can be a
reviler, or you can be a Christian. You can’t be both.” According to 1 Cor.
5:11, the one who reviles, and slanders others is the one who is to be treated
as an unbeliever.
How should the church deal with a marriage that
is fractured by abuse? How should we respond to and counsel a man with this sin
pattern? He needs to be confronted with his sin but, “the problem is that
when abusers are confronted about their behavior, not only will they often lie
outright to their pastors and/or counselors, they will spin events and hateful,
hurtful statements they have made in such a way as to minimize or project blame
onto the other party(ies).” And these kinds of people are usually such
experts at manipulating the facts and seeming sincere that they nearly always
fool everyone. The author recalls a personal instance and other victims’
accounts where this kind of cover-up occurred and their husbands even boasted
about it to the wives later. Her own ex-husband even told her how he’d told the
pastor he wanted her back. She was incredulous and said, “Why would you say
that? You hate me! Did you tell him you loved me?” His response after laughing
was, “it never came up.” “Inexperienced pastors, pre-disposed to believe the
man’s side, often do nothing to help the woman – instead, they often side
against her along with her husband.” The lack of seriousness of the abuser’s
sin along with their emphasis on the woman’s responsibility for her husband’s
treatment of them is not only unbiblical, it is sin. Yet, sometimes pastors
add to the burden by pressuring the wives into returning to a man
who they know has no intention of changing. Some Christians have even told
women that they need to, “endure this suffering for Christ.” But “the real
‘truth’ that we display to the world by accepting abuse in a marriage is that
God would have us suffer for someone else’s pleasure (not His). “When the
marriage covenant has been broken through ongoing abuse, trust is shattered.
Try as they might, well-meaning clergy cannot always put the pieces back
together again, nor should the victim feel compelled to return when the
situation has not changed.” It is fairly common knowledge that if someone was
seriously sinned against – for example in sexual abuse or rape - you can
forgive that person, but that doesn’t mean you continue in close contact with
them. Restoration is very different from forgiveness. If someone purposely hurt
your child, you would not let them anywhere near that child again until you
were sure they had changed. Once again, even if they are “sorry,” sins like
these are deep, ingrained patterns and the person is not to be trusted
until there is assurance of true repentance. Yet wives with abusive husbands
are told to go back and submit to him? Is this what God meant when He said,
“Marriage is to be held in honor by all” (Heb 13:4)?
Furthermore, church leaders lead the rest of the
Church and other Christians to also side against the abused woman and threaten
her church discipline for divorcing her unrepentant husband. These women are, “shamed by
the churches they trusted to protect them – all in the name of saving a
marriage over a person.” Although Scripture does admonish us to, “Obey your
leaders and submit to them,” (Heb 13:17) church leaders are human and sometimes
wrong and this verse does not mean unconditional obedience.
This pressure to return to her abuser and using spiritual authority to further
coerce her to submit tragically adds spiritual abuse to her suffering. Spiritual
abuse is using the Word of God or spiritual position to convince or manipulate
another person into doing what you think they should do. Of course, most
people don’t think they are manipulating or anything like that – they think
they are “standing for truth” and doing what the Bible says. But even as
Christians who value and love the Word of God we can sometimes have views and
opinions that do not line up with the full counsel of God.
When a woman finds the
courage to tell someone about the abuse she has been suffering, we need to
validate her experience and not disregard it.
If there is some reason to doubt her story, we can ask for more details and dig
deeper, but it is extremely rare for someone to lie about ongoing abuse
and they are often taking a big risk by speaking out. “The words ‘I believe
you’ are incredibly empowering to an abused woman.” I recall two instances of three different friends telling me about their husbands and father. Both times I
was shocked, as I knew two of three men in question, and couldn’t imagine these men being
abusive in such ways. But I believed all of them – no questions asked. I
learned more about the situations later which confirmed I was right to do so,
but too often people assume that victims are at the very least exaggerating.
But worse that not being believed, victims, instead of receiving help and
support, receive judgment from other Christians. (In the book there are
several examples given of this happening to completely innocent parties.) It is
amazing how harsh and judgmental other Christians (who usually do not know the
whole story) can be. Too often we assume someone who was divorced (especially
if they seem to be initiating and wanting the divorce) was somehow to blame and
holds at least some responsibility, yet it is not right for us to assume if we
do not know. The author herself, lost friends, trust, respect from Christians
who should have known better than to make assumptions and pass judgment. Most simply just wanted to trust the church leadership - and this is probably what is most tragic.
I personally know the
author of this book. Marie O’Toole (formerly Notcheva) has been
given grace to persevere and stay faithful to God despite the abuse from her
husband and subsequent spiritual abuse from her church. I write more about her
story and this topic in my follow-up post which I encourage you to read here.
To my sorrow, other people I know personally did not believe her and/or valued the
opinion of these church leaders over her. But Christians, we cannot condone
sin. To shun a woman because she fled an abusive relationship and refused to go
back and submit to her abuser is wrong and damaging, to the woman, the church
and the name of Christ. Divorce is not always a sin, sometimes, it is
the most godly thing a person can do.
Brethren, let us stop passing judgment until we
have heard the whole story and searched the whole of Scripture. For Jesus
Himself said, “For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and
with the measure you use, it will be measured to you” (Matt. 7:2). Let us
show mercy to those who are suffering, let us hold sinners accountable, let us
rescue those in distress as Scripture calls us to: “Maintain the right of
the afflicted and the destitute. Rescue the weak and the needy; deliver them
from the hand of the wicked” (Psalm 82:3-4).
For additional reading
on this topic see the following articles:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for reading - please feel free to comment! I appreciate your thoughts, encouragement and even differing opinions but please be considerate and respectful in how you express yourself.