A friend of mine recently asked me why I didn't like Rachel Jankovic (author and daughter of Pastor Doug Wilson) and thought she was a hypocrite. Here is my response. (I will probably add to this as time goes on and I have more time to write more specific things.)
So my primary concern with Rachel is her affiliation and similar
teaching/theology as her father (thus this post is about "the Wilson's"). I have done extensive digging into his theology,
character, and handing of church/other matters and would put him in the
category of a false teacher. There are too many serious concerns to not to. I
believe his teaching to be dangerous. In fact, I consider Doug Wilson a dangerous false teacher and an abusive
narcissist. So, while I will admit I have not thoroughly
examined Rachel's writing/speaking very specifically, as she and her father work
together and teach/hold to the same things I haven’t felt it was necessary to
spend the time to do that.
As for their hypocrisy... a hypocrite is someone who says one thing and does another. If someone claims to be an orthodox, Biblical teacher, but teaches things that are opposed to, even offensive to the truths of Orthodox Christianity, than umm yeah that makes them a hypocrite. So the real issue here is whether or not what the Wilson's teach is consistent with Scripture and Orthodox Christianity.
I will below list my main areas of concern with the Wilson's
(and by this I mean Doug Wilson, his family or really anyone associated with him). Please note I
don’t necessarily agree with everything his critics say or believe themselves,
but when it comes to the topic(s) at hand, I believe they are absolutely right in
their critique and concerns. Those who have gleaned good things from the Wilson's may think they are just throwing stones, but
most of them have tried very hard to be fair in their critiques and concerns. Some
of these are or seem small, but small things add up as well. Small flaws in
character add up to bigger ones. The more small things I saw, the more I slowly
became concerned. It will take some time for you to get through all this…. It was
several months of me listening, reading and researching to come to the convictions I have now.
Doug Wilson’s questionable (heretical?) theology: It
is important to say that a lot of what the Wilson's say, *seems* orthodox
and right, and a lot of it IS orthodox. However, their false doctrine/teaching
is extremely sneaky and subtle. I will share a lot of what others have
written/said since they have done more extensive work and say it better than I
could.
His view of Justification This is one of the biggest
and most serious concerns. I really don’t have time to write out a whole explanation
and argument, plus the two below do it very well:
https://theocast.org/is-doug-wilson-a-false-teacher/
https://thelondonlyceum.com/on-justification-doug-wilson-and-the-moscow-doctrine/
On Federal Vision: This is rather complex, but to summarize for
you, Wilson says he’s Reformed, but the views he holds on the Covenants
and on justification do not line up with traditional/orthodox Reformed
theology. A lot of Reformed people outside his camp have serious concerns with
views on this (and obviously Arminians would strongly disagree with him in this area of theology as well). https://carm.org/about-theology/what-is-federal-vision-theology-and-is-it-biblical/
(P.S. Doug Wilson has claimed he no longer holds to “Federal
Vision” however, it is very important to note that he has NOT rejected the
theology that Federal Vision holds to - and that is the problem. In other
words, he’s rejecting the label but keeping the theology. Tricksy… and completely
hypocritical.)
Views on men’s/women’s roles: The more I have read/heard from the Wilson's on this
topic, the more I have been seriously concerned - and downright disgusted. The extreme patriarchy is very subtle at times, but I would assert is NOT in line
with Biblical complementarianism. Again, they say a lot of things
thare are actually right or at least *seem* right, but digging deeper I have often seen some red
flags and have thoughts like “ehhh I’m not sure that’s quite right/balanced”.
And on further study, I've found their view to not be in line with Scripture. As Rachel has written more about the area of womenhood it's important to address her specifically here. But as she is collusion with her father, I cannot freely trust her view
on being a Biblical woman/wife/mother. While I have seen she does have many good and right
things to say, there are also some huge concerns and wrong theology... At best, I would have to give too many cautions to feel I could recommend
her to anyone.
Here's an article documenting the abusive teaching on a wife's obligation to submit to rape: https://www.vice.com/en/article/inside-the-church-that-preaches-wives-need-to-be-led-with-a-firm-hand/
Here is something from Rachel's own mouth... she's being grossly mistreated/controlled and doesn't even see it... seriously? What Christ-like husband would treat his brand new wife like this???: https://www.facebook.com/ExaminingMoscow/videos/346749201336488
And while we're at it, here's another video from Rachel with a rather shocking condemning and
hypocritical attitude. Other's "know for absolute certain?" You're a
woman, you can't do anything right - that is the main message I've gotten from Rachel.
https://www.facebook.com/ExaminingMoscow/videos/1920306348165019
And one more for you:
I can also talk about Nancy Wilson and her parenting advice.... you can watch clips of her "Biblical parenting advice" here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=75lZfjq_GWg The whole Wilson family also appears in this video - notice the gaslighting from several of them - Dean (the host/critic) is really good at pointing out the red flags you should notice. (P.S This is very similar to the Pearl's borderline(at best?) abusive parenting advice - STAY AWAY! P.S.S. I am not at all anti-spanking, I think it can be fine done correctly, but it can very easily be done wrongly.)
I will add here that I have personal experience of having to
submit to and respect a husband who was in the wrong - who was going the wrong
direction theologically - it was hard, I had to learn and grow a lot in my obedience
to God in my submission and attitude towards my husband, however, my
complementarianism/beliefs about submission are NOT the same as the Wilson's. I
would absolutely not put them in the same category.
I have seen too many quotes and heard things Doug Wilson himself has
said that
are downright demeaning to women and completely unbiblical. Here’s an
example: It might just be a woman's fault if she gets raped.... “But
women who genuinely insist on ‘no masculine protection’
are really women who tacitly agree on the propriety of rape.”
(Douglas Wilson, Her Hand in Marriage, p. 13) (And no, I’m not taking this out of context, you can read more in articles I’ve shared).
Here’s some people who have written about concerns in this
area:
https://fullmetalpatriarchy.wordpress.com/category/doug-wilson/
https://mereorthodoxy.com/sex-submission-and-evangelicals-doug-wilson-controversial-words
https://spiritualsoundingboard.com/2016/01/15/pastor-doug-wilson-on-rape-submission-feminists-and-boobs/
Doug Wilson/Christ’s church handing of sexual sin and
sexual abuse:
This is another HUGE concern. I'm not sure there is
another area of all of life that makes me more angry than the
ignoring/injustice of abuse in "Christian" environments. If I were to
curse like Doug Wilson and his crew does, this is where I'd do it. Not
only do the above patriarch
views allow for this kind of thing to flourish, there continues to be
very
little accountability or serious concern for protecting others and
dealing with
abusers appropriately. There has been NO admission of “hey maybe we got
this
wrong” only defensive tactics. I have looked into this probably the most
extensively - I have listened to the victims and others who witnessed
the situation(s), read reports, the actual court cases, etc.
You can find more information about the abuse cases at this link
(which also provides links to actual court cases): https://bredenhof.ca/2023/07/10/doug-wilson-the-ugly/
Another article on this issue:
https://religiondispatches.org/sexual-abuse-is-inevitable-in-christian-patriarchy-just-take-a-look-at-doug-wilsons-christ-church-and-its-new-documentary-eve-in-exile-the-restoration-of-femininity/
Other personal/character concerns:
His crude language and sexualized content. This is mentioned
in several of the resources I’ve shared, but worth stating again. Much of it is
downright disgusting and inappropriate for a Christian. I have directly read
and personally listened to SO many crude things, and swear words (F-word,
s-word, d-word and so much more) from Doug Wilson and from others who work
closely with him. I will not link any videos or proof of this one but it's easy to find. They literally throw these words around the same as an unbeliever would. Is this really the kind of people you want to recommend to others?
Also, when he first was trying to become pastor of his current
church, the elders didn’t think he conformed to their statement of faith
(mainly having to do with his view of justification above). They asked him to either
conform or step down. Instead, he mobilized church members to support him and
basically forced the other elders to resign/leave and took over the leadership
of the church. It was a forcible power struggle that he won. This is not an
appropriate way to be any kind of respectable leader and I consider this a very bad indication of his
character - but it lines up with other control issues that are reported. (This whole thing is common knowledge and a number of people have
written about it - it’s mentioned in several of the resources I shared.) The main
reason Wilson formed his own denomination is that none of the other main (Presbyterian Church of America is where he first tried to join) denominations would accept
him. There’s nothing necessarily wrong with starting your own denomination, but
if it’s because you can’t find a single one you could at least be acceptable in
- that indicates a problem. Not to mention I'm pretty sure he's just a narcissist who wants to be in complete control.
Other resources:
I would recommend checking out this facebook page (they are also on Instagram) - I wouldn’t
agree with all their angles or everything they say, but they bring to light a
lot of what I mentioned above and a lot of provide evidence in videos, quotes, documents, etc. https://www.facebook.com/ExaminingMoscow
This is written by a unitarian, so obviously there are some
things in there we wouldn’t agree with him on, however he tries to be fairly
fair and goes through some of the other things mentioned above as well as some
I didn’t take the time to mention (i.e. Doug Wilson’s controlling nature, sloppy
writing and references in writing, his view on slavery in America, his extreme
patriarchy, extreme political views, etc. - all of which I would agree are
concerning).
https://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/ngier/wilsonempire.htm
In closing, so yes, I absolutely warn against the Wilson's, and anyone associated with them. If you're not convinced yet, take the time to listen to/read through the links provided.